<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Show full process name / path / string in Solaris using ps</title>
	<link>http://www.davidyahalom.com/index.php/show-full-process-name-path-string-in-solaris-using-ps/</link>
	<description>Innovative Integration</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 00:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.davidyahalom.com/index.php/show-full-process-name-path-string-in-solaris-using-ps/#comment-22107</link>
		<author>Matt</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 02:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.davidyahalom.com/index.php/show-full-process-name-path-string-in-solaris-using-ps/#comment-22107</guid>
		<description>/usr/ucb/ps also truncates the command lines it displays, though its limit is longer than that of /usr/bin/ps.

The only ready-made way I know of to display a process's command line arguments from a shell under Solaris is the program 'pargs'.

Neither version of 'ps' shipped with Solaris reports to you that it has truncated its output when it does so.
The manpages say that 'ps' displays the process command line, but it does not always do this. So the doco is wrong.

Worse, when ps truncates its output, yielding potentially plausible but certainly false command lines, it doesn't tell you that it's lying to you!
Silent failures are the worst kind.

I haven't observed the same failure under Linux using the procps tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>/usr/ucb/ps also truncates the command lines it displays, though its limit is longer than that of /usr/bin/ps.</p>
<p>The only ready-made way I know of to display a process&#8217;s command line arguments from a shell under Solaris is the program &#8216;pargs&#8217;.</p>
<p>Neither version of &#8216;ps&#8217; shipped with Solaris reports to you that it has truncated its output when it does so.<br />
The manpages say that &#8216;ps&#8217; displays the process command line, but it does not always do this. So the doco is wrong.</p>
<p>Worse, when ps truncates its output, yielding potentially plausible but certainly false command lines, it doesn&#8217;t tell you that it&#8217;s lying to you!<br />
Silent failures are the worst kind.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t observed the same failure under Linux using the procps tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cruz</title>
		<link>http://www.davidyahalom.com/index.php/show-full-process-name-path-string-in-solaris-using-ps/#comment-16371</link>
		<author>Cruz</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 03:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.davidyahalom.com/index.php/show-full-process-name-path-string-in-solaris-using-ps/#comment-16371</guid>
		<description>Well, that just saved my ass, so thanks a lot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that just saved my ass, so thanks a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Websites tagged "solaris" on Postsaver</title>
		<link>http://www.davidyahalom.com/index.php/show-full-process-name-path-string-in-solaris-using-ps/#comment-323</link>
		<author>Websites tagged "solaris" on Postsaver</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.davidyahalom.com/index.php/show-full-process-name-path-string-in-solaris-using-ps/#comment-323</guid>
		<description>[...] - Show full process name / path / string in Solaris using ps saved by xmcrxangelx2008-09-14 - Yay for Zones! saved by veerenmaristeam32008-08-25 - Installing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] - Show full process name / path / string in Solaris using ps saved by xmcrxangelx2008-09-14 - Yay for Zones! saved by veerenmaristeam32008-08-25 - Installing [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

